Gloucestershire have spent more than a century being Gloucestershire. They have a cathedral, a cider culture, a county name that most people outside the county spell with a pause in the middle, and a cricket ground that, as it happens, already sits inside Bristol. So the club has looked at falling revenue and reached the obvious conclusion: become Bristol, the city where they already play.

This is a county changing its name to the city it already lives in, like a pub renaming itself after its postcode. It is marketing logic at its most efficient, which is to say it has stopped thinking about the people it is meant to represent and started thinking about the search-engine traffic it might capture. Somewhere in a meeting room, someone said the word ‘footprint’ and nobody asked what it was stepping on.

The implications are bigger than a scorecard. Fans from Cheltenham, the Cotswolds, and the Forest of Dean have spent generations singing for a place with its own edges and its own grudges. Being told they now support Bristol is a little like being told your nan is now called Susan because Susan tests well with under-thirties.

If branding is the game, then why stop at a regional city? London draws the biggest crowds and the most headlines. Gloucestershire should be London by Christmas. Nobody would ever need directions again.