The government has discovered a problem so perfectly absurd that it could only exist in modern Britain: parents on benefits lose money when their children start earning. The solution? A one-time payment of up to £4,500. Problem solved. Except, of course, it is not.

Here is how the logic works. Your child lands an apprenticeship—congratulations, they are now learning a trade and earning perhaps £6 an hour. You, the parent on Universal Credit or similar, suddenly find your benefits cut because your household income has technically increased. So the government, recognizing this creates a perverse incentive to discourage your kid from working at all, will now give you £4,500 to offset the loss. It is like being charged £10 to enter a shop, then given a £7 voucher when you complain.

The real comedy is the navigation required. You must know this payment exists. You must apply for it. You must understand the benefits system well enough to calculate whether it actually covers your loss. Meanwhile, your child is learning plumbing or electrical work—skills that will eventually pay far more than their allowance ever did—and you are both trapped in a bureaucratic calculation that somehow makes everyone feel worse about the whole arrangement.

It is not that the government is wrong to try. It is that they are solving the problem one hand-written form at a time, when the actual problem is that the entire system treats a teenager’s first job like an economic threat rather than progress. But sure, £4,500. That should smooth things over.